|
The City Council has blessed a
"historic," $300 million
makeover of Jack London Square
that officials expect will spur
long-awaited redevelopment.
Late Tuesday, the council
unanimously voted to give
development firm Ellis Partners
almost everything it wants to
build a "world-class"
waterfront.
"This is a turning point in the
economic development of the
city," said Councilman Danny Wan
(Grand Lake-Chinatown). "It is
historic, and I'm very happy and
glad to be on the council that
votes on this project."
The nine-building project will
include a mix of retail
businesses and offices, a
centerpiece market hall and
possibly a movie theater and
250-room hotel.
The San Francisco-based
developer will have 15 years to
complete the project and, for
the most part, will not need
future city approval to do so.
Building uses can be changed by
the developer without additional
city review, and only two
buildings must be built within
the first eight years of the
deal. Ellis Partners said
construction could begin as soon
as September, when it hopes to
begin restoring 66 Franklin St.
Council members said those
concessions were worth it to
give Ellis Partners flexibility.
They also said the firm's
partners are trustworthy and
have already made compromises to
ease concerns of the
neighborhood.
"This is a big experiment for
us," said Councilmember Jean
Quan (Montclair-Laurel). "This
is a little bit like a marriage.
We are putting a little trust
into this, and I appreciate the
balance and the compromise."
In the months preceding the
council's vote, Ellis Partners
made several concessions in
hopes of satisfying concerned
residents who wanted assurances
the project would be built as
promised.
Ellis Partners reduced the total
office space initially sought
and agreed to bring all building
designs back to the city for
review.
The developer will now have
three deadlines during the
15-year agreement. Ellis also
agreed to have at least 60
percent of its food outlets
owned by regional and local
firms rather than national
chains.
In addition, Ellis Partners
agreed to give residents a
larger say in how a proposed
parking garage in front of the
Amtrak station will look. But it
will not have to change the mass
or height of the structure.
"You don't always get your wish
list," said Councilmember Jane
Brunner (North Oakland). "But
when you have a developer like
this, it is critical that both
sides get what they need."
Besides, Brunner and others
said, without Ellis Partners
stepping forward, Jack London
Square would remain a center of
struggling retail stores or
become a hodgepodge of new
developments that would take at
least 20 years to build.
But many residents, who spent
months trying to win
concessions, didn't buy all the
arguments.
"How is this project going to
add to the quality of life of
residents, not to the quality of
life of the developers," said
John Graves, a local resident.
"This is like an arranged
marriage and you can't get a
divorce, you have to live with
it."
Parking remains an issue, they
said. The parking garage at the
Amtrak station will be too big,
and the location of fast-food
restaurants should be reviewed
by the city, residents argued.
Also of concern was a
requirement that the firm
provide only $150,000 worth of
public art. Ellis Partners
promised to spend more but would
not commit to a number.
Hal Ellis, owner of the
development firm, rejected an
idea by Councilmember Desley
Brooks (Eastmont-Seminary)
to raise the amount of money to
be spent on public art.
"It would be arbitrary to try to
find a figure that would be
fair," he said. "We are
committed to having a very
significant public arts
program."
Gary Knecht,
president of the South of
Nimitz
Improvement Council, focused on
the parking.
Knecht
said the city's calculation of
how much parking the development
would need is flawed because it
is based in part on a study
conducted in 2002.
"Every time we have had a public
hearing on this project, it has
gotten better,"
Knecht
said. "So I would beg you to
continue to have public hearings
for the next 15 years so we can
have the world-class project we
have been promised."
James
Falaschi, a partner in
the development team, agreed the
public has made the project
better and said it will continue
to have a voice in the
development.
"When you step back and look at
it, the project is better
because of that,"
Falaschi
said.
The City Council must vote on
the project a second time July 6
before the deal becomes final.
Ellis Partners must also win
approval from the Bay
Conservation and Development
Commission, an agency that
regulates waterfront
development. |